Despite a goal and an assist, supporters slam Elliott’s display as ‘not good enough’ for Arne Slot’s vision
Liverpool’s 3-2 loss to Brighton may have ended in frustration, but one player’s performance sparked a firestorm of reaction. Despite contributing a goal and assist, Harvey Elliott’s showing has drawn scathing criticism from fans, with many now believing that Arne Slot has seen enough to justify selling the 22-year-old.
Elliott, making just his second Premier League start under Slot, tapped in a goal after slick work by Conor Bradley and Mohamed Salah, and laid off the ball for Szoboszlai’s strike. Yet the backlash was brutal.
The Fans’ Verdict:
“He’s jogging back, leaving Gravenberch exposed. That’s not Slot’s style.”
“Goal and assist? Doesn’t matter. He’s out of his depth in midfield.”
“Elliott plays like a competition winner—technically decent, but not ready.”
“Slot demands relentless intensity. Elliott doesn’t offer that off the ball.”
While his attacking flair is acknowledged, his defensive contribution, pressing effort, and tactical awareness were heavily questioned. Fans noted he made just one tackle all game, often leaving gaping holes for Brighton to exploit.
Slot’s Dilemma
With Liverpool already planning for reinforcements, including the imminent arrival of Jeremie Frimpong and active pursuits of players like Milos Kerkez and Xavi Simons, Elliott’s place is under real threat. Some supporters believe the Brighton game might be his last big audition—and one he may have failed.
The message is clear: Talent alone isn’t enough under Arne Slot. Elliott
must evolve—or exit.
