Liverpool signed Florian Wirtz from Leverkusen for a whopping £116 million. They went on to bid £120 million for Isak. They gave Frankfurt €90 million for Ekitike. Then they have the audacity to question Arsenal for paying £50 million for a Premier League-proven player. Liverpool knows they can’t attract these players without throwing millions. They have 6 Champions League titles, yet they can’t pull players — a club with zero pull. They move like QPR with Wi-Fi. ✨️Hope✨️

Liverpool Splash £300M+ in Wild Transfer Window — But Hypocrisy Leaves Rival Fans Fuming

Liverpool’s jaw-dropping summer spending has sent shockwaves through the football world — but it’s the double standards from some of their fans that’s sparking debate across social media.

After securing Florian Wirtz from Bayer Leverkusen for a British-record £116 million, the Reds didn’t stop there. They reportedly launched a £120 million bid for Newcastle striker Alexander Isak, only to be turned away. Undeterred, they pivoted and paid €90 million (£78m) for Eintracht Frankfurt’s Hugo Ekitike, sealing a six-year deal with the 23-year-old Frenchman.

The total? Well north of £300 million — and that’s without factoring in additional fees for Jeremie Frimpong (£29.5m) and Milos Kerkez (£40m), both also arriving this summer.

But while Liverpool are clearly going all-in under new manager Arne Slot, rival fans have been quick to point out the irony.

“Imagine spending £116m on Wirtz, £90m on Ekitike, offering £120m for Isak — then mocking Arsenal for paying £50m for a Premier League-proven player,” wrote one Arsenal supporter on X (formerly Twitter).
Another chimed in: “Liverpool’s pulling power is so weak they need to throw money just to get players to look their way. 6 Champions Leagues, still no pull. They move like QPR with Wi-Fi.”

Buying Credibility?

The criticism stems from a perceived lack of organic pull. Despite Liverpool’s decorated history — including six Champions League titles — fans are pointing out that the club seems to rely more on inflated transfer fees than pure prestige to attract talent.

Ekitike reportedly only agreed to the move after Liverpool outbid other suitors, and Wirtz’s signing came only after beating out Manchester City and Bayern with a financial package too good to refuse.

Meanwhile, the same fanbase questioning Arsenal’s measured investment in Premier League-ready players — such as their recent £50 million signing — is drawing heat for the hypocrisy.

“Liverpool fans acting like kings of the market while spending like billionaires with zero patience,” another fan said. “You’d think they just discovered oil in the Mersey.”

Hope or Hype?

To their credit, Liverpool are showing ambition. These aren’t panic buys — Wirtz, Frimpong, and Ekitike all fit Slot’s pressing, fast-paced vision. But with big-money comes big pressure — and not everyone is convinced they’ve bought wisely.

While Arsenal, Manchester City, and even Chelsea are taking a more targeted, methodical approach, Liverpool’s galáctico-style spree has become the summer’s biggest storyline — and perhaps its riskiest gamble.

Will it lead to glory? Or will it be another reminder that money can’t always buy chemistry — or credibility?

One thing’s certain: the internet never forgets.

✨️Hope.✨️

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *