Liverpool have been plunged into sudden turmoil in a dramatic twist at the club’s training ground, where fictional reports suggest captain Virgil van Dijk has taken an extraordinary stance—refusing to train and declaring he will not feature in the upcoming match against Inter Milan.
In this imagined storyline, the centre-back’s protest is said to be a direct reaction to the controversial choice to bench Mohamed Salah in the recent clash with AC Milan. What began as a disputed selection call has spiraled into a full-blown dressing-room crisis capable of destabilizing Liverpool’s season.
In the fictional account, Van Dijk allegedly delivered a blunt message:
“I’m not coming to training, and I won’t play against Inter Milan after Salah was dropped like that against AC Milan. It was a huge insult to him, and I won’t stand by and watch it happen.”
He is then said to have reinforced his position:
“Without him, last season’s Premier League title wouldn’t have happened. Everyone knows it. I’m not training or playing until he gets the respect he deserves.”
Whether driven by loyalty or emotion, this imagined stance sends shockwaves through the fictional dressing room, raising concerns about leadership fissures and the stability of manager Arne Slot.
How the Fictional Fallout Began
In this scenario, Slot’s decision to leave Salah out of the AC Milan lineup caught several senior players off guard. Though Slot claimed it was a tactical choice, fictional sources say many within the squad saw it as unwarranted and poorly handled.
The lack of communication reportedly made matters worse, with some players discovering Salah’s omission only when the team sheet was released.
Van Dijk’s Imagined Stand: Loyalty or Disruption?
Within the fictional narrative, Van Dijk—typically a symbol of leadership—takes a dramatic stance that highlights deeper issues. It reflects frustrations not just about Salah but about a perceived growing disconnect between senior players and the manager.
A fictional source put it this way:
“He thought it was disrespectful. He feels decisions like this show the club is losing its identity.”
Player Reactions in the Imagined Dressing Room
This fictional crisis reportedly divides the squad.
Some players empathize with Van Dijk’s reasoning but disagree with refusing to train. Others believe dramatic measures are necessary to send a message.
One fictional teammate says:
“This is getting out of control. We need unity, but emotions are running high.”
A younger player counters:
“Slot is the manager. Whether we like it or not, skipping training doesn’t fix anything.”
What This Means for Arne Slot (In the Story)
Already under pressure in this fictional timeline, Slot faces a deeper challenge as his authority appears shaken. A fractured dressing room is far more dangerous than poor form.
Liverpool’s board, in this fictional plot, faces three difficult options:
- Back the manager and discipline players
- Support the senior players and risk undermining Slot
- Try to negotiate a fragile compromise
What Comes Next in This Fictional Scenario
With a fictional match against Inter Milan looming, the club must decide whether the captain will face internal action, be brought back into the fold, or be left out entirely.
Fans within this fictional world fear the club may be heading toward the kind of instability that has derailed other major teams in recent years.
As one fictional fan puts it:
“This is how big clubs fall apart. When players revolt, everything gets messy.”
In this storyline, Liverpool urgently need unity, clarity, and strong leadership—qualities that suddenly seem in short supply.
